Shira Petrack

Traffic to Target on the Rise 

Following a difficult 2025, Target appears to be on a recovery path. Weekly visits from February 2 to March 22, 2026 rose 6.6% to 10.3% year over year, suggesting that the company's turnaround strategy – which includes improving its product assortment and in-store experience – is beginning to deliver results.

Visits on Circle Days Exceed 2024 & YTD Traffic Levels

In-store traffic volume during the company's recent Circle Days also suggest that a turnaround is on the horizon. Average daily visits during this year's Circle Days (March 25th to 27th 2026) were 2.9% and 5.9% higher than the comparable spring events in 2024 and 2025, respectively – despite those prior events benefiting from weekend days. (In 2024 and 2025, Target's spring Circle Day promotion ran for seven days.) Traffic was also higher compared to the YTD same-weekday average – that shoppers are returning to Target, with Circle Days further boosting already elevated traffic levels.

Will Target Make a Comeback in 2026? 

Target’s early-2026 performance suggests its turnaround efforts are beginning to resonate, supported by investments in stores, staffing, and merchandising aimed at improving the in-store experience. Encouraging traffic trends – including stronger performance during Circle Days despite already elevated baseline visits – point to renewed shopper engagement. If Target can sustain this momentum beyond promotional periods, it appears well positioned for stabilization and modest growth in 2026.

For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor 

Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.

Luxury Department Stores Have Pulled Ahead of Mono-Brand Boutiques

Traffic trends highlight a growing divergence between mono-brand boutiques and luxury department stores. While both formats have faced headwinds, department stores have consistently outperformed mono-brand boutiques on a year-over-year basis, maintaining relatively stable visitation compared to the sharper and more sustained declines seen across mono-brand locations. This gap has been especially pronounced since the second half of 2025, where mono-brand traffic trends weakened significantly while department stores showed greater resilience.

Part of this gap may be explained by structural differences between the formats. Department stores offer broader assortments, multiple price points, and the ability to support a range of shopping missions in a single visit, allowing them to capture demand across a wider spectrum of consumers. Mono-brand boutiques, by contrast, are more tightly tied to full-price luxury positioning, making them inherently more exposed to fluctuations in discretionary spending.

Mono-Brand Stores' Greater Dependence on Aspirational Shoppers May Be Driving the Divergence 

But even as luxury department stores offer a broader range of products that can appeal to a wider audience, trade area demographics suggest that mono-brand boutiques rely more heavily on aspirational shoppers. While both formats drew from affluent areas in 2025, mono-brand stores captured a higher share of households below the $100K income threshold – indicating greater exposure to more price-sensitive consumers. Department stores, by contrast, skewed toward higher-income households, providing a more stable demand base.

This distinction also helps explain the widening traffic gap between the two formats. As discretionary spending tightens, aspirational shoppers are often the first to pull back. And because mono-brand boutiques seem to depend more on this segment – and lack the pricing flexibility and assortment breadth to retain them – they are experiencing sharper declines. Meanwhile, department stores, supported by a more affluent customer base and greater assortment diversity, are better positioned to sustain traffic and overall performance.

Not All Luxury Retail Is Built the Same

The divergence between the two luxury formats suggests that both who shops and how they shop matter as much as brand strength. Mono-brand boutiques’ greater exposure to aspirational consumers leaves them more vulnerable in periods of constrained spending, while department stores benefit from both structural flexibility and a more resilient customer base. As the environment remains uneven, performance will likely hinge on a retailer’s ability to align format, pricing strategy, and audience with today’s shifting demand dynamics.

For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.

Not a One-to-One Relationship Between Retail Visits & Population

While a state’s share of brick-and-mortar retail visits generally tracks with its share of the U.S. population, the chart below shows that the relationship is not perfectly proportional. Some states, such as Texas and Florida, generate a larger share of retail traffic than their population size alone would suggest, while others, such as California and New York, account for a smaller portion of visits relative to their population base. 

Sun Belt Over-Indexing vs. Coastal Underperformance

Mapping each state’s share of retail visits to its share of the population reveals a clear geographic pattern: Across much of the Sun Belt, retail visits tend to over-index relative to population, while under-indexing is more common along the West Coast and in parts of the Northeast.

Several structural dynamics may help explain this regional divide. Migration into Sun Belt markets has been driven in part by lower costs of living, and once there, households may have more discretionary income relative to high-cost coastal markets – supporting more frequent in-person shopping trips. At the same time, consumer behavior differs across regions: in higher-cost coastal and Northeastern markets, shoppers may be more likely to consolidate trips or shift spending online, contributing to fewer retail visits per capita. 

Strategic Implications for Retailers and CRE Professionals

For retailers and CRE professionals, these patterns suggest that a data-driven expansion strategy should account not just for population growth, but for how and where consumers choose to shop across regions.

Sun Belt markets may offer outsized opportunities for physical retail expansion, as higher-than-expected foot traffic signals strong in-person engagement and potential demand for additional brick-and-mortar supply. Conversely, in coastal and Northeastern markets, where visits under-index and e-commerce adoption is higher, success may depend more on experiential retail, premium formats, or omnichannel integration rather than footprint growth alone. 

For more data-driven retail and CRE insights, visit placer.ai/anchor. 

Shamrock Shake and Big Arch Generate Modest Traffic Gains

Recent McDonald's menu additions such as the annual Shamrock Shake release and the Big Arch Burger pilot appear to have generated only a modest lift in McDonald’s foot traffic. Although visits increased 5.5% year-over-year during the week of February 16th 2026 – the week of the Shamrock Shake's launch – traffic the following week dipped -0.5%, suggesting the seasonal item generated only a short-lived bump rather than a sustained lift in visits. And the heavily publicized Big Arch generated just a 2.2% YoY traffic boost during its launch week of March 2nd to March 8th 2026 – although performance may strengthen as the item gains traction with consumers.

Consumers May Be Growing More Selective as Economic Pressures Persist

So while these LTOs did generate modest traffic lifts for the chain, the impact was relatively muted compared to some of last year’s stronger performers, such as McDonald’s Grinch Meals. These results may suggest that consumers are becoming increasingly selective in their spending – potentially making it more difficult for QSR chains to rely on LTOs alone to drive meaningful traffic momentum without additional value-oriented offerings.

Combining Value and Innovation May Improve Traffic Momentum 

While recent LTOs delivered only modest gains on their own, pairing LTOs with a clearer value proposition – such as the upcoming McValue 2.0 – may prove more effective, with limited-time items drawing attention and value-focused offerings encouraging repeat visits. In a price-sensitive environment, this dual strategy could drive a more sustainable traffic lift than product innovation or value promotions alone.

For more data-driven restaurant insights, visit placer.ai/anchor. 

Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.

Retail Corridor Traffic Has Recovered – But Not Fully

Foot traffic to retail corridors nationwide plummeted during the shelter-in-place restrictions of 2020, and recent data shows that visits have yet to fully recover to 2019 levels. While traffic has steadily improved each year since the pandemic lows, 2025 visits remain 11.7% below their pre-pandemic baseline. 

What is holding the retail corridor recovery back? We dove into the data to find out. 

Weekday Weakness Highlights the Impact of Hybrid Work

Retail corridors are typically concentrated in downtown areas, featuring a mix of stores, restaurants, bars, and offices – and are often surrounded by even more office space. And comparing average visits per day of week in 2025 and 2019 suggests that the persistence of hybrid and remote work is likely driving much of the lag. 

Monday through Thursday foot traffic to retail corridors was down between 16.3% and 17.3% in 2025 compared to 2019. The gap narrowed to 11.7% on Friday as activity began to shift toward the weekend, and nearly disappeared on Saturday (-2.8%) and Sunday (-4.2%).

The much larger weekday deficit suggests that reduced office attendance continues to weigh on downtown retail activity. With fewer workers commuting daily, there are fewer pre-work coffee stops, lunchtime errands, and spontaneous after-work visits that once fueled these corridors. So while leisure-driven weekend traffic has largely rebounded, the office-driven weekday ecosystem that historically sustained retail corridors has yet to fully return.

Office Hours Show the Largest Traffic Gaps

Hourly data reinforces the role that office attendance (or lack thereof) is playing in the retail corridor visit lag. The steepest declines are concentrated squarely within traditional workday hours: visits between 7 AM and 11 AM are down 23.7% compared to 2019, followed by a 19.2% decline from 11 AM to 3 PM. But the gap is much more moderate both earlier and later in the day (from 12 AM to 7 AM and 3 PM to 12 PM) in the day later in the day, with visits down 13.7% from 3 PM to 7 PM and just 9.6% after 7 PM. This suggests that the missing traffic is closely tied to reduced daily commuting – fewer morning coffee runs, lunch breaks, and midday errands – while evening and leisure-oriented visits have proven far more resilient. With more schedule flexibility, downtown businesses and civic stakeholders may need to focus on creating reasons for consumers to intentionally visit downtowns during slower weekday hours, rather than relying on routine commuter traffic to fill stores organically.

Adapting Downtown Retail to a Hybrid Era

The retail corridor traffic data suggests that downtowns are facing a structural shift in when and why people visit. With fewer daily commuters, stakeholders may need to focus less on restoring a five-day office week and more on activating the days and hours that already show strength. Civic leaders can prioritize safety, cleanliness, transit reliability, and targeted weekday programming or events that encourage intentional trips downtown. Retailers and dining concepts can adapt hours, promotions, and experiences to better align with flexible work schedules. In a hybrid era, success may depend less on recreating old commuting patterns and more on making downtown a destination people choose – not just a place they pass through.

For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.

Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.

Darden Posts Modest Q4 2025 Gains 

Traffic to Darden banners remained relatively stable in 2025, with the company seeing an average increase of 1.2% in overall visits coupled with a slight dip of 0.3% in average visits per venue across its brands. Average visits per venue improved towards the end of the year relative to the annual average, growing 1.5% YoY in Q4 2025 – likely due to the closure of several Bahama Breeze restaurants in 2025, part of the company's plans to sunset the banner entirely by April 2026. 

LongHorn & Premium Brands Lead 

Analyzing traffic by banner points to clear resilience at the top of the market, with upscale casual and premium brands such as Yard House and Ruth's Chris Steakhouse generally showing the strongest and most consistent traffic growth. This pattern suggests that higher-income consumers remain relatively insulated and willing to spend, even amid broader volatility. 

At the same time, LongHorn Steakhouse, one of Darden’s largest brands, also emerged as a standout performer, delivering steady positive traffic across multiple months. Given its scale within the portfolio, LongHorn likely made an outsized contribution to Darden’s overall positive traffic trends, helping to offset softness in other chains and reinforcing the company’s momentum.

Same-Store Traffic Trends Signal Genuine Demand Resilience 

Same-store YoY visit trends in recent months are very close to overall visit trends, suggesting that Darden’s traffic trends are largely same-store-driven rather than expansion-driven, with little evidence that unit growth is materially distorting overall traffic trends. Premium brands continue to perform well, and LongHorn is generating steady same-store growth across its large footprint, suggesting that Darden’s results are being driven by real consumer demand – especially among higher-income diners.

Darden’s results suggest that performance is being driven less by sheer scale and more by brand positioning, with concepts that offer either premium experiences or strong value perception (like LongHorn) capturing disproportionate demand. As consumer budgets remain tight, growth is likely to concentrate further in brands that clearly justify their price point – leaving middle-of-the-road concepts increasingly pressured to sharpen their value proposition or differentiate more meaningfully.

For up-to-date restaurant foot traffic, visit our free Industry Trends tool.

Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.